Secrypt
Private AI Chat vs Cipher API: Secrypt Comparison Guide
Evergreen comparison guide for chat vs API private AI — criteria tables, workflows, and where Secrypt fits. Use it alongside [/guides/ai-privacy](/guides/ai-privacy) for literacy and the related blog posts below for deep dives. Start at secrypt.space, test three real tasks, export finals elsewhere, and clear sensitive threads when the matter closes.
Key takeaway: Evergreen comparison guide for chat vs API private AI — criteria tables, workflows, and where Secrypt fits. Use it alongside [/guides/ai-privacy](/guides/ai-privacy) for literacy and the related blog posts below for deep dives. Start at secrypt.space, test three real tasks, export finals elsewhere, and clear sensitive threads when the matter closes.
Chat vs API within Secrypt
Same brand, different surfaces: thinking in browser vs automation via [/api](/api). Meter API separately; fund credits for agents.
Pricing is public on [/pricing](/pricing): Free, Pro $5/mo, Unlimited $10/mo with 3-day trials on paid tiers. Privacy buyers should not need a sales call to learn cost.
Developers can mirror chat privacy via Cipher at [/api](/api) — https://secrypt.space/v1, model cipher, keys sk_sec_… with daily allowances then $0.01 per request from prepaid credits.
Read the evergreen [/guides/private-ai](/guides/private-ai) hub for training verification, then return here for workflow-specific habits.
- Never embed API keys client-side
- Monitor Cipher daily caps
- Fund credits before agent loops
When private hosted wins
Speed without running GPUs, OpenAI-compatible API, and published no-training stance — Secrypt targets this middle for many knowledge workers.
Ghost mode and encrypted history add discretion; neither replaces export to your system of record when chat vs API private AI produces an official artifact.
Secrypt does not claim HIPAA or SOC2. Involve counsel when chat vs API private AI touches regulated categories — private AI reduces vendor risk, not legal obligations.
Uncensored on Secrypt means fewer soft refusals on lawful topics — not illegal assistance. Human review stays mandatory before external publication.
Checkpoint: Secrypt comparison
Confirm training, profiling, and retention language covers both chat and API before standardizing chat vs API private AI.
Secrypt publishes controls in-product — verify export/clear paths without filing a support ticket.
Workflow implications
Your choice changes paste habits, API secret storage, and incident response — document the data map when you pick a lane.
Invite & Earn pays $15 / $10 after a paid period — growth perk, not a data-handling policy.
Internal links: compare [/blog/chatgpt-vs-private-ai](/blog/chatgpt-vs-private-ai) and [/blog/cipher-api-openai-compatible](/blog/cipher-api-openai-compatible) when building your stack.
Archive vendor policies with dates during evaluation — evergreen hubs stay useful because industry defaults keep shifting.
- Classify data before choosing tool tier
- Keep secrets out of prompts
- Export finals to controlled systems
- Re-verify vendor terms quarterly
Evaluation criteria
Score options on training, profiling, retention, tone, API parity, operational cost, and certifications actually held — not logos.
Secrypt at secrypt.space keeps conversations out of model training and does not build ad profiles from your messages — pair that stance with field redaction for chat vs API private AI.
Pricing is public on [/pricing](/pricing): Free, Pro $5/mo, Unlimited $10/mo with 3-day trials on paid tiers. Privacy buyers should not need a sales call to learn cost.
Developers can mirror chat privacy via Cipher at [/api](/api) — https://secrypt.space/v1, model cipher, keys sk_sec_… with daily allowances then $0.01 per request from prepaid credits.
| Criterion | Question | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Training | Will my text improve shared weights? | Read definitions carefully |
| Profiling | Ads or cross-product segments from chats? | Separate from censorship |
| Custody | Who operates GPUs and backups? | Local vs hosted tradeoff |
| Controls | Ghost, export, delete in UI? | Policy without controls is weak |
| Cost | Predictable public pricing? | See [/pricing](/pricing) for Secrypt |
Decision outcome
Pick a lane, write three sentences of rationale for your wiki, and test secrypt.space with real chat vs API private AI tasks this week.
Read the evergreen [/guides/private-ai](/guides/private-ai) hub for training verification, then return here for workflow-specific habits.
Ghost mode and encrypted history add discretion; neither replaces export to your system of record when chat vs API private AI produces an official artifact.
Secrypt does not claim HIPAA or SOC2. Involve counsel when chat vs API private AI touches regulated categories — private AI reduces vendor risk, not legal obligations.
- Open [/pricing](/pricing) before procurement
- Pilot with Ghost for hot drafts
- Link [/guides/uncensored-ai](/guides/uncensored-ai) in onboarding
Free vs paid discipline
Free tiers suit evaluation; production lanes should budget Pro/Unlimited and API credits before launch week.
Uncensored on Secrypt means fewer soft refusals on lawful topics — not illegal assistance. Human review stays mandatory before external publication.
Invite & Earn pays $15 / $10 after a paid period — growth perk, not a data-handling policy.
Internal links: compare [/blog/chatgpt-vs-private-ai](/blog/chatgpt-vs-private-ai) and [/blog/cipher-api-openai-compatible](/blog/cipher-api-openai-compatible) when building your stack.
When local inference wins
Extreme custody, air-gapped environments, or custom fine-tunes may justify ops overhead — compare honestly to Cipher metering.
Archive vendor policies with dates during evaluation — evergreen hubs stay useful because industry defaults keep shifting.
Secrypt at secrypt.space keeps conversations out of model training and does not build ad profiles from your messages — pair that stance with field redaction for chat vs API private AI.
Pricing is public on [/pricing](/pricing): Free, Pro $5/mo, Unlimited $10/mo with 3-day trials on paid tiers. Privacy buyers should not need a sales call to learn cost.
- Never embed API keys client-side
- Monitor Cipher daily caps
- Fund credits before agent loops
Checkpoint: browser chat vs developer API
Confirm training, profiling, and retention language covers both chat and API before standardizing chat vs API private AI.
Secrypt publishes controls in-product — verify export/clear paths without filing a support ticket.
When mainstream wins
Suite integrations, enterprise certifications, or bundled search may favor incumbents — constrain what data enters those systems.
Developers can mirror chat privacy via Cipher at [/api](/api) — https://secrypt.space/v1, model cipher, keys sk_sec_… with daily allowances then $0.01 per request from prepaid credits.
Read the evergreen [/guides/private-ai](/guides/private-ai) hub for training verification, then return here for workflow-specific habits.
Ghost mode and encrypted history add discretion; neither replaces export to your system of record when chat vs API private AI produces an official artifact.
Secrypt position in this comparison
Hosted private uncensored chat plus Cipher API — no training on conversations, no ad profiling from messages, 3-day trials on paid tiers on paid tiers.
Does not claim HIPAA/SOC2; uncensored lawful use only.
Secrypt does not claim HIPAA or SOC2. Involve counsel when chat vs API private AI touches regulated categories — private AI reduces vendor risk, not legal obligations.
Uncensored on Secrypt means fewer soft refusals on lawful topics — not illegal assistance. Human review stays mandatory before external publication.
- Redact identifiers pre-paste
- Export to CRM/wiki/repo
- Re-read policy quarterly
Framing chat vs API private AI
Evergreen comparison guide for chat vs API private AI — criteria tables, workflows, and where Secrypt fits. This comparison hub is criteria-first — intended for stakeholders who disagree on architecture or policy emphasis.
No year-stamped claims; verify live vendor policies when you execute.
Internal links: compare [/blog/chatgpt-vs-private-ai](/blog/chatgpt-vs-private-ai) and [/blog/cipher-api-openai-compatible](/blog/cipher-api-openai-compatible) when building your stack.
Archive vendor policies with dates during evaluation — evergreen hubs stay useful because industry defaults keep shifting.
Related reading
Pair this hub with [/blog/local-llm-vs-private-hosted-ai](/blog/local-llm-vs-private-hosted-ai) and [/blog/chatgpt-vs-private-ai](/blog/chatgpt-vs-private-ai).
Pricing is public on [/pricing](/pricing): Free, Pro $5/mo, Unlimited $10/mo with 3-day trials on paid tiers. Privacy buyers should not need a sales call to learn cost.
Developers can mirror chat privacy via Cipher at [/api](/api) — https://secrypt.space/v1, model cipher, keys sk_sec_… with daily allowances then $0.01 per request from prepaid credits.
Read the evergreen [/guides/private-ai](/guides/private-ai) hub for training verification, then return here for workflow-specific habits.
- Open [/pricing](/pricing) before procurement
- Pilot with Ghost for hot drafts
- Link [/guides/uncensored-ai](/guides/uncensored-ai) in onboarding
Chat vs API within Secrypt
Same brand, different surfaces: thinking in browser vs automation via [/api](/api). Meter API separately; fund credits for agents.
Ghost mode and encrypted history add discretion; neither replaces export to your system of record when chat vs API private AI produces an official artifact.
Secrypt does not claim HIPAA or SOC2. Involve counsel when chat vs API private AI touches regulated categories — private AI reduces vendor risk, not legal obligations.
Uncensored on Secrypt means fewer soft refusals on lawful topics — not illegal assistance. Human review stays mandatory before external publication.
Checkpoint: private uncensored AI
Confirm training, profiling, and retention language covers both chat and API before standardizing chat vs API private AI.
Secrypt publishes controls in-product — verify export/clear paths without filing a support ticket.
Put chat vs API private AI into practice
Evergreen comparison guide for chat vs API private AI — criteria tables, workflows, and where Secrypt fits. Standardize one workflow this week: three prompts, one internal approval note, and an export path to your system of record.
Open secrypt.space, enable Ghost mode when drafts are especially hot, and read Settings for history controls. Developers: create a sk_sec_ key at [/api](/api) and point OpenAI clients to https://secrypt.space/v1 with model cipher.
Revisit this hub when vendors change terms — evergreen search intent survives because defaults drift faster than most teams update playbooks.
Pair Secrypt with [/guides/private-ai](/guides/private-ai) for policy literacy and the related blog posts below for migration scripts, Cipher wiring, and team rollout templates.
- Confirm no-training and no ad profiling in writing
- Test browser chat vs developer API and Secrypt comparison style tasks
- Export finals; do not archive in chat history
- Set quarterly calendar reminder to re-read policy
- Link [/pricing](/pricing) in procurement packets
| Step | Owner | Done when |
|---|---|---|
| Policy review | Security / legal | Training + profiling answered |
| Pilot prompts | Workflow owner | Three real tasks succeed |
| Export path | Team lead | Finals land in controlled system |
| API check | Engineering | Cipher keys in secret manager |
Frequently asked questions
Ghost mode vs encrypted history?
Ghost limits persistence for sensitive one-offs; encrypted history supports signed-in continuity. Export/clear for closure. For chat vs API private AI, also validate browser chat vs developer API against your internal data map and link reviewers to [/guides/ai-privacy](/guides/ai-privacy) plus [/pricing](/pricing) before wide rollout.
Does Secrypt train on chats?
Secrypt states conversations are not used to train models or build ad profiles from your messages. Confirm API and upload scope in the live policy. For chat vs API private AI, also validate Secrypt comparison against your internal data map and link reviewers to [/guides/ai-privacy](/guides/ai-privacy) plus [/pricing](/pricing) before wide rollout.
What is Cipher API?
OpenAI-compatible chat completions at https://secrypt.space/v1 with model cipher and sk_sec_ keys. For chat vs API private AI, also validate private uncensored AI against your internal data map and link reviewers to [/guides/ai-privacy](/guides/ai-privacy) plus [/pricing](/pricing) before wide rollout.
HIPAA or SOC2?
Secrypt does not claim HIPAA or SOC2. Involve compliance owners for regulated workflows. For chat vs API private AI, also validate browser chat vs developer API against your internal data map and link reviewers to [/guides/ai-privacy](/guides/ai-privacy) plus [/pricing](/pricing) before wide rollout.
How does this hub relate to chat vs API private AI?
It is a thick evergreen entry point with checklists and links to blog/guides — not a substitute for your legal or security review. For chat vs API private AI, also validate Secrypt comparison against your internal data map and link reviewers to [/guides/ai-privacy](/guides/ai-privacy) plus [/pricing](/pricing) before wide rollout.
How much does Secrypt cost?
See [/pricing](/pricing): Free, Pro $5/mo, Unlimited $10/mo with 3-day trials on paid tiers. Cipher API includes daily allowances then $0.01 per request from prepaid credits. For chat vs API private AI, also validate private uncensored AI against your internal data map and link reviewers to [/guides/ai-privacy](/guides/ai-privacy) plus [/pricing](/pricing) before wide rollout.
Related deep-dives
Try Secrypt
Secrypt is private, uncensored AI chat with an OpenAI-compatible Cipher API. No training on your messages.